<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defend Roadless Areas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/</link>
	<description>Links for the internet hobo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PowderLover</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/comment-page-1/#comment-19191</link>
		<dc:creator>PowderLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/#comment-19191</guid>
		<description>Those facts are amazing. Working for the Park Service I agree that there are places that shouldn&#039;t have roads and places that can remain as wild as when the world was flat.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://steamboat-springs.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PowderLover&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those facts are amazing. Working for the Park Service I agree that there are places that shouldn&#8217;t have roads and places that can remain as wild as when the world was flat.</p>
<p><a href="http://steamboat-springs.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">PowderLover</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/comment-page-1/#comment-19161</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/#comment-19161</guid>
		<description>We used one of those roads -- you know, the dirty, narrow, winding ones with the awesome views -- to boondock alongside the Arkansas river for last few nights. You&#039;d think they&#039;d pave those things, sheeesh. And what&#039;s with the 15MPH
speed limit? Seriously, it was posted.

But seriously, thanks for this post. I don&#039;t think we need any more speed limit signs in the wilderness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used one of those roads &#8212; you know, the dirty, narrow, winding ones with the awesome views &#8212; to boondock alongside the Arkansas river for last few nights. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d pave those things, sheeesh. And what&#8217;s with the 15MPH<br />
speed limit? Seriously, it was posted.</p>
<p>But seriously, thanks for this post. I don&#8217;t think we need any more speed limit signs in the wilderness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/comment-page-1/#comment-19156</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberhobo.net/hobolinks/2008/03/31/defend-roadless-areas/#comment-19156</guid>
		<description>According to an Ordnance Survey study, the most remote part of Britain is 7 miles away from a tarmac road (not including tracks that allow vehicles). Given that seven miles is a comfortable walk, I don&#039;t think that makes Britain very remote. I don&#039;t know what the answer would be for the USA? I assume there are many more untouched areas. Something to be preserved - for definite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an Ordnance Survey study, the most remote part of Britain is 7 miles away from a tarmac road (not including tracks that allow vehicles). Given that seven miles is a comfortable walk, I don&#8217;t think that makes Britain very remote. I don&#8217;t know what the answer would be for the USA? I assume there are many more untouched areas. Something to be preserved &#8211; for definite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
